<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The rise, fall, and rebirth of Muxtape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://us.music-jobs.com/blog/index.php/lee-jarvis/the-rise-fall-and-rebirth-of-muxtape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://us.music-jobs.com/blog/index.php/lee-jarvis/the-rise-fall-and-rebirth-of-muxtape/</link>
	<description>News, reviews, gigs and gossip for the US music scene</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Dunlop</title>
		<link>http://us.music-jobs.com/blog/index.php/lee-jarvis/the-rise-fall-and-rebirth-of-muxtape/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Dunlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://us.music-jobs.com/blog/?p=20#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I loved the old one, and I know I&#039;ll use this one. However the original was unique in its publication of what people were &#039;listening to&#039;, not what they were self promoting. It&#039;s now similar to a DJ mix with 8 out of 12 tracks produced by the DJ doing the mix - a little narcissistic (sorry Jafar!) If that&#039;s the point (self-promo), how does this format differ from Myspace music?

In a Muxtape I want to hear music that inspired a person to get to the point at which they are at now, not what they make themselves. Of course I want to hear that too, but there are hundreds of web based services providing that already.

I don&#039;t mean to be down on Muxtape 2.0 - I loved it for what it was. I just don&#039;t see the point of &#039;relaunching&#039; a different service with very similar (yet greatly diminished) functionality to Myspace music.

But then again, rather than change a very successful business model and resource, why don&#039;t we just disband the collection of obstinate Neanderthals masquerading as the RIAA, and replace with an organisation familiar with 21st Century commerce and digital innovation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the old one, and I know I&#8217;ll use this one. However the original was unique in its publication of what people were &#8216;listening to&#8217;, not what they were self promoting. It&#8217;s now similar to a DJ mix with 8 out of 12 tracks produced by the DJ doing the mix &#8211; a little narcissistic (sorry Jafar!) If that&#8217;s the point (self-promo), how does this format differ from Myspace music?</p>
<p>In a Muxtape I want to hear music that inspired a person to get to the point at which they are at now, not what they make themselves. Of course I want to hear that too, but there are hundreds of web based services providing that already.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to be down on Muxtape 2.0 &#8211; I loved it for what it was. I just don&#8217;t see the point of &#8216;relaunching&#8217; a different service with very similar (yet greatly diminished) functionality to Myspace music.</p>
<p>But then again, rather than change a very successful business model and resource, why don&#8217;t we just disband the collection of obstinate Neanderthals masquerading as the RIAA, and replace with an organisation familiar with 21st Century commerce and digital innovation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

